Shared vendor audit to save resources? Why not?

March 15, 2019

Shared vendor audit to save resources? Why not?

e clinical trials are extraordinarily expensive and addendum to ICH GCP E6 R2 recommends to “encourage implementation of improved and more efficient approaches to clinical trial design, conduct, oversight, recording and reporting”, as well as to use risk-based approach when planning the activities in clinical trials, industry must move forward and utilize efficient procedures in any possible area. One of the ways to optimize is through shared audits.

A shared audit is an audit, conducted by several companies at one time through an independent auditing company.

  • Shared audit means shared costs.
  • Shared audit saves effort and time – you don’t have to send your QA person, break working processes and try to fit in another audit.
  • As an addition to the previous one, a shared audit saves money on travel costs.
  • You can share an audit with any regulatory similar company – for example, works perfectly for the EU and the USA. It doesn’t even have to be only two companies – the number of participants is limited by you. By adding more participants, you save more money on the cost of the whole process.
  • Shared audits are no different from standard audits from a regulatory point of view, so there are no problems with further processing of its results. Remember the quote from the ICH in the first paragraph? Share audits are a perfect fit.
  • You can share not only an existing vendor audit but also a new vendor qualification.

And here’s a piece of experience:

Last year we had our first shared audit.

In our case, it was two of our clients, both EU based, so regulatory similar. Before the actual audit started, both clients agreed on a contractor – independent auditing company, and an audit plan, based on their needs and requirements. As a vendor and the audit subject, Flex Databases received and used two audit plans: with similar content but separated to provide to every participant of the process. The audit took three full days, the process went smoothly, and the same way dozens of previous audits went.

After the audit, we’ve received two reports, that were reviewed by participating companies in accordance with their own requirements. And we’ll boast a little here – we got only a few corrections and comments. After we’ve implemented corrective and preventive actions, the process for us was complete.

If you want to know more about our experience with shared audits from a vendor perspective – send us a message to contact@flexdatabases.com.

If you’re looking for a new eClinical solutions vendor – here we are, audit and questions ready. Request a demo via the button on top of the page or drop us an email to bd@flexdatabases.com.

Blog

April 15, 2026
TMF Blinding: Removing the Complexity of Managing Blinded Studies

Blinded studies are critical for maintaining the integrity of clinical trials. But while the concept is straightforward, the operational reality is often anything but. For many clinical teams, managing blinding means dealing with: This creates a constant burden: Even with strict processes in place, a single misconfiguration can compromise the entire study. TMF Blinding in […]

April 2, 2026
CTMS for CRO Financial Management: Managing Clinical Trial Budgets and Investigator Payments

Financial management is critical because CROs must ensure that clinical trials remain within budget while generating expected revenue. Without proper financial oversight, organizations may experience delayed payments, incorrect invoicing, or reduced project profitability. A CTMS helps CROs maintain financial control and improve operational efficiency. Financial management is one of the most complex operational areas for […]

April 1, 2026
Risk-Based Monitoring (RBM) in Clinical Trials: A Comprehensive Guide to Modern Oversight

For decades, the clinical research industry operated under a manual, labor-intensive oversight model. The gold standard was 100% Source Data Verification (SDV) – a process where Clinical Research Associates (CRAs) traveled to sites to painstakingly cross-reference every data point in a Case Report Form against medical records. However, as trials have become more data-saturated and […]

March 26, 2026
Why MapLight Therapeutics Chose Flex Databases’ CTMS and eTMF

MapLight Therapeutics selected Flex Databases to support its clinical trial operations with an integrated CTMS and eTMF platform. In this interview, the MapLight team shares why they chose Flex Databases, which features stood out during the evaluation process, and how the platform will support efficient trial oversight and long-term clinical operations. What were the key […]

Contact us

Get in touch to discuss compliance, implementation, demos, pricing

We are here for all of your questions! Tell us more about yourself and we will organize a tailored live demo to show how you can power up your clinical trials processes with Flex Databases.