Shared vendor audit to save resources? Why not?

March 15, 2019

Shared vendor audit to save resources? Why not?

e clinical trials are extraordinarily expensive and addendum to ICH GCP E6 R2 recommends to “encourage implementation of improved and more efficient approaches to clinical trial design, conduct, oversight, recording and reporting”, as well as to use risk-based approach when planning the activities in clinical trials, industry must move forward and utilize efficient procedures in any possible area. One of the ways to optimize is through shared audits.

A shared audit is an audit, conducted by several companies at one time through an independent auditing company.

  • Shared audit means shared costs.
  • Shared audit saves effort and time – you don’t have to send your QA person, break working processes and try to fit in another audit.
  • As an addition to the previous one, a shared audit saves money on travel costs.
  • You can share an audit with any regulatory similar company – for example, works perfectly for the EU and the USA. It doesn’t even have to be only two companies – the number of participants is limited by you. By adding more participants, you save more money on the cost of the whole process.
  • Shared audits are no different from standard audits from a regulatory point of view, so there are no problems with further processing of its results. Remember the quote from the ICH in the first paragraph? Share audits are a perfect fit.
  • You can share not only an existing vendor audit but also a new vendor qualification.

And here’s a piece of experience:

Last year we had our first shared audit.

In our case, it was two of our clients, both EU based, so regulatory similar. Before the actual audit started, both clients agreed on a contractor – independent auditing company, and an audit plan, based on their needs and requirements. As a vendor and the audit subject, Flex Databases received and used two audit plans: with similar content but separated to provide to every participant of the process. The audit took three full days, the process went smoothly, and the same way dozens of previous audits went.

After the audit, we’ve received two reports, that were reviewed by participating companies in accordance with their own requirements. And we’ll boast a little here – we got only a few corrections and comments. After we’ve implemented corrective and preventive actions, the process for us was complete.

If you want to know more about our experience with shared audits from a vendor perspective – send us a message to contact@flexdatabases.com.

If you’re looking for a new eClinical solutions vendor – here we are, audit and questions ready. Request a demo via the button on top of the page or drop us an email to bd@flexdatabases.com.

Blog

April 29, 2025
Advancing Trial Master File Technology: Trends, Challenges, and Practical Applications in a Quality-Driven Era – Poster Session at CDISC TMF Europe Interchange!

Flex Databases is heading to Geneva on May 15–16! Visit our poster session presented by Marietta Sarkisian, Global Director of Business Development & Marketing, to explore how TMF technology is evolving to meet rising quality expectations in clinical trials. Let’s connect at #CDISCInterchange! Contact us at contact@flexdatabases.com

User Groups at Flex Databases: Where Feedback Meets Innovation

At Flex Databases, we believe the best solutions are built together. That’s why we created Flex Databases User Groups – a unique meetings where our clients and their end-users come together to: Our User Groups are more than just meetings – they are a space for open dialogue, collaboration, and innovation.By listening to your experiences, […]

Use Case: Saving Time and Cost with AI in TMF Document Management

A mid-sized CRO managing 9,500 TMF documents annually faced increasing challenges with filing and metadata assignment. Each document required an average of 5–6 minutes to process manually. The Problem Manual document upload and metadata entry amounted to: This process also posed risks of human error and inconsistency. The Solution The CRO implemented an AI-powered eTMF […]

April 22, 2025
Why Sponsors Are Pushing CROs to Adopt Modern CTMS Solutions

Nowadays the relationship between sponsors and contract research organizations (CROs) has evolved. What once was a simple outsourcing arrangement has become a strategic partnership, where both parties are expected to operate with full transparency, speed, and strict adherence to regulatory standards. Sponsors are no longer satisfied with periodic updates and disconnected spreadsheets. They want real-time […]

Contact us

Get in touch to discuss compliance, implementation, demos, pricing

We are here for all of your questions! Tell us more about yourself and we will organize a tailored live demo to show how you can power up your clinical trials processes with Flex Databases.