AI validation for life sciences – a unique challenge of dynamic nature

Feb 28, 2024

Let’s agree that in our regulated industry we take EXTRA cautious approach towards adopting new technologies. A standard validation approach of again standard computerized systems already includes

  • the requirement for Installation Qualification (IQ)
  • Design Qualification (DQ)
  • Operational Qualification (OQ)
  • and Performance Qualification (PQ)

This is for standard all-time favorites – EDC, eTMF, CTMS, etc. But what about if we add AI to this? With changing test results as it learns on more and more data? How do you validate something that may very well give you different outcome with every run?

When applying AI to the validation of GxP computerized systems, the industry faces a unique challenge: the dynamic nature of AI, particularly in data handling, defies traditional validation frameworks focused on system performance and installation. This evolving data landscape makes it difficult to guarantee results with absolute certainty. Therefore, the question remains: What aspects need validation to ensure confidence in AI-driven processes, and is it possible to achieve 100% certainty?

Spoiler alert! We know how! And we will share more in the upcoming weeks.

The traditional validation approach is well-established over the past decade, involves comprehensive documentation to ensure systems are thoroughly tested and validated.

In recent years, regulatory bodies have begun to adapt to technological advancements. The FDA has introduced guidelines for Computer Software Assurance (CSA) to implement a risk-based approach to software validation. Similarly, the International Society for Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE) updated its GAMP®5 guide, advocating for critical thinking and iterative methods in validation processes.

Moreover, the integration of AI in daily operations is no longer just a trend; early adopters are leveraging AI to streamline GxP-related activities.

However, the use of AI in validation and documentation processes raises significant questions about trust and reliability. Can the results produced by AI, or documents created by AI, be trusted? This dilemma suggests a need to blend traditional validation methods with innovative technologies.

The FDA’s publication on “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Software as a Medical Device” provides insights into regulatory directions for AI. In December 2023, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released its “Artificial Intelligence Workplan”, outlining its approach to AI regulation until 2028. Despite these efforts, the absence of definitive regulations for AI in this context leaves companies navigating uncertain waters.

More about our products

Webinar with deloitte
Webinar Recording: Quality Digitalization with Deloitte

Did you miss our recent webinar on Quality Digitalization? The recording is now available! In this insightful session, Anna Petrovskaya, QA Director at Flex Databases, and Vera Valesova, PhD, Senior Manager at Deloitte, explore the critical aspects of transforming your QMS into a digital solution. Key topics covered: Watch the full webinar and gain valuable […]

Learn more
FDA guidance
FDA Releases Guidance on Electronic Systems, Electronic Records, and Electronic Signatures in Clinical Investigations: Questions and Answers

In October 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a final guidance titled Electronic Systems, Electronic Records, and Electronic Signatures in Clinical Investigations: Questions and Answers. https://www.fda.gov/media/166215/download    This guidance provides recommendations on the use of electronic systems, electronic records and electronic signatures in food, medical product, tobacco product, and new animal drug clinical investigations.  […]

Learn more
top ctms 2024
Flex Databases Recognized as a Top Clinical Trial Management Provider for 2024

We are excited to share that Flex Databases has been named a Top Clinical Management Provider for 2024 by Life Science Review. This prestigious recognition highlights our strong reputation and the trust placed in us by both customers and industry peers, reflected in numerous nominations from Life Science Review subscribers. This award comes at a […]

Learn more
regulatory blinder checklist for clinical trial docs
Regulatory Binder Checklist for Clinical Trial Documentation

A regulatory binder is crucial for managing clinical trial documents, it ensures compliance with regulations, and makes audits easier. It helps keep important documents organized and readily accessible for trial monitors, auditors, and regulatory authorities, and serves as a useful reference for the research team. While it’s not legally required, maintaining a regulatory binder is […]

Learn more

Get in touch to discuss compliance, implementation, demos, pricing

We are here for all of your questions! Tell us more about yourself and we will organize a tailored live demo to show how you can power up your clinical trials processes with Flex Databases.